Hi Vijay, A revised I-D that adds a note under "Rules for Lexical Equivalence" is available at [1].
[1] https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-pal-eidr-urn-2016-02.txt Best, -- Pierre On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Vijay, > >> I will appreciate if the "including 'urn:eidr:'" part made it into the draft. > > Ok. > > BTW, should I plan on creating a new I-D before the scheduled > telechat, or after? > > Thanks, > > -- Pierre > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Vijay K. Gurbani <[email protected]> wrote: >> Pierre: Thank you for attending to my comment. More inline. >> >> On 07/02/2016 03:30 PM, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux wrote: >>> >>> Hi Vijay, >>> >>> I appreciate the review and comment. >>> >>>> That is, are the schemes (urn, eidr) part of the case-insensitive string >>>> match? >>> >>> >>> Yes, it looks like >>> >>> "Lexical equivalence of EIDR-URN is defined by case-insensitive string >>> match." >>> >>> should say >>> >>> "Lexical equivalence of URN-EIDR is defined by case-insensitive string >>> match." >>> >>> This would confirm that the entire URN-EIDR string defined in >>> "Declaration of syntactic structure" is considered for matching, >>> including "urn:eidr:". >> >> >> I will appreciate if the "including 'urn:eidr:'" part made it into the >> draft. Implementers have varying level understanding as they attempt >> to divine RFC text. So to the extent that we can make our intent >> explicit with a few additional strokes of the pen (or the keyboard), we >> are all the more better off for it. >> >> Cheers, >> >> - vijay >> -- >> Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Nokia Networks >> 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA) >> Email: [email protected] / [email protected] >> >> Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
