Please disregard this - wrong I-D name in the subject line. I sent a corrected version.
Regards, Dan From: Gen-art [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan) Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 5:32 PM To: General Area Review Team Cc: [email protected] Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-08 I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq><https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__trac.tools.ietf.org_area_gen_trac_wiki_GenArtfaq-26gt-3B&d=CwQFAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=AyhyRHseIb7KXH8tfY_AtqV0W2CNoyGjEbDlcYKuTK4&s=ueIei6thx_uucwLd00irmU-2d-d3OZR6DmsdMo_xASk&e=>. Document: draft-hardy-pdf-mime-02 Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review Date: 07/07/16 IETF LC End Date: 07/21/16 IESG Telechat date: Summary: Ready. This informational document which obsoletes RFC 3778 provides an overview of the PDF format and updates the media type registration of "application/pdf" by aligning it with RFC 6838. I am no expert in application formats, but the document seems to be well informed and clearly written. A couple of nits generate id-nits warnings (updating RFC 3778 is not mentioned in the Abstract, one unused reference) that can be easily fixed during the RFC Editor processing. Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments:
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
