Ruediger,

Thanks and regards,
   Brian

On 29/08/2016 19:19, [email protected] wrote:
> Hi Brian,
> 
> thanks. I've submitted a new version without the nits (I applied "RFC nnnn" 
> notation for non-reference mentions).
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Ruediger
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon/
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-09
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-09
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Gesendet: Montag, 29. August 2016 06:47
> An: [email protected]; General Area Review Team
> Betreff: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-08
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review 
> Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the 
> IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call 
> comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-08.txt
> Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
> Review Date: 2016-08-29
> IETF LC End Date: 2016-09-08
> IESG Telechat date:
> 
> Summary: Ready with nits
> --------
> 
> Comments:
> ---------
> 
> 1. I was co-chair of the original diffserv WG, and I have tracked this draft 
> throughout its life and influenced some of its content. I have re-read it 
> carefully for this review.
> 
> 2. I believe it is correctly positioned as Informational. It might become a 
> candidate for BCP with deployment experience.
> 
> Nits:
> -----
> 
> Section 4 mentions RFC2575, certainly a typo for RFC2475.
> 
> Non-reference mentions of RFCs are inconsistent, e.g. both "RFC4594" and  
> "RFC 4594" occur.
> 

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to