I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
For more information, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-mibs-obsolete-01 Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review Date: 8/29/2016 IETF LC End Date: 2016-08-24 IESG Telechat date: 2016-09-01 Summary: Ready with nits. Note. I did not run these MIBs through any verification tools. Major issues: None. Minor issues: * The document does not pass IDnits. The only complaint of IDnits that I am concerned of is: "** The document seems to lack an Introduction section." Anyway, if Motivation section is considered equivalent to Introduction section then I am fine and the IDnits complaints can be neglected all together. * Other MIB modules than IPV6-TC has in each their DESCRIPTIONs text saying by what it was obsoleted. Unless I am missing something here (that justifies the absence of disclaimers) I would like to see similar text in each IPV6-TC DESCRIPTION as well. Nits/editorial comments: * Line 2223 has unnecessary linefeed/empty line. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
