Hi, >I was just having a look at the updated draft - the changes are fine AFAICS. > >However, looking at it again, I think a more informative title would not go >>amiss. How about: > > Clarifications to SDP offer/answer Negotiations in RFC 5761 > >Sorry - should have noticed on previous pass.
Don’t worry – I agree a more informative title would be useful :) What about “RFC 5761 SDP Offer/Answer Clarifications”? Regards, Christer -------- Original message -------- From: Elwyn Davies <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: 16/09/2016 23:45 (GMT+00:00) To: Christer Holmberg <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-avtcore-5761-update-02 Hi Christer. Thanks. That's fine. Cheers, Elwyn Sent from Samsung tablet.
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
