Thanks for that. For some reason gmail sent this to the spam folder.
Yoav > On 7 Oct 2016, at 20:32, Kathleen Moriarty <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Orit, > > Thanks for the review, making sure the editor see this. > > Kathleen > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Orit Levin <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call > comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>>. > > Document: review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-safecurves-04 > Reviewer: Orit Levin (mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>) > Review Date: 2016-09-27 > IETF LC End Date: 2016-09-29 > IESG Telechat date: unknown > > Summary: > This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be > fixed before publication. The nits are purely editorial, but fixing them will > improve the document's readability. > > 1. Introduction > Par.1 "key agreement (Diffie-Hellman)" : Replace with "key agreement using > Diffie-Hellman". > Par.2 "That document": Replace with the name of the document to make clear > which one is "that" document. > Par.2 "free from": Replace with "resilient to". > > 2. Curve25519 and Curve448 > Add at the start "Implementations of Curve25519 and Curve448 MUST/SHALL > follow the steps described in this section." > Par.1 Replace "are inherited from" with "are compliant with". > Par.2 Replace "goes as" with "is performed as" > > 3. Use and Negotiation in IKEv2 > Consider replacing TBA1/TBA2 throughout the section with [to be replaced with > TBA1/TBA2 according to the IANA assignment]. > 3.2 Consider replace the first sentence with > "Receiving and handling of incompatible point formats MUST comply with [or > MUST follow] considerations/procedures described in section 5 of [RFC7748]." > > 4. Security Considerations > Par.1 Replace the paragraph text to > "For high-performance constant-time implementations, it is RECOMMENDED to use > Curve25519 and Curve448 which were designed for this purpose. Implementers > MUST/SHOULD NOT attempt to improve performance by reusing supposedly > ephemeral key pair across multiple key exchanges [because ...]." > Par.3 In " ... the process used to pick these curves..." replace "these" with > the names to avoid confusion. > Par.3 Replace " ...verification has been done..." with "verification can be > done". > Par.4 Replace ",generated in a fully verifiable way," with "that are > generated in a fully verifiable way". > > 6. Acknowledgements > Par1. Replace "is by Mike" with "were defined/specified/etc. by Mike". > Par1. Replace "are in RFC 7748" with " are documented/specified/etc. in RFC > 7748". > > Thank you, > Orit. > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > Kathleen
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
