On 10/12/16 12:55 AM, Eggert, Lars wrote:
thanks for the review!
On 2016-10-11, at 21:21, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzi...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
(1) NIT: "RTT" is used without definition. (There used to be a definition but
it has been removed.)
I think this can be addressed by an RFC Editor Note.
(2) NIT: unlinked references
I found a number of cases where, in the html format, references are not
[RFC4342] section 3
[RFC6679] section 3.1.7
[RFC1981] section 3.2
[RFC6935] section 3.4.1
As mentioned before, these are due to bugs in the rfcmarkup tool. Please file a
Sorry - I forgot you mentioned this before.
Gen-art mailing list