I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-kitten-rfc6112bis-02
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 21 Oct 2016
IETF LC End Date: 2 Nov 2016
IESG Telechat date: Not yet scheduled on a telechat
Summary: Ready with nits
Nits/editorial comments:
Shouldn't the IANA considerations instruct IANA to update the registries
at
http://www.iana.org/assignments/kerberos-parameters/kerberos-parameters.xhtml
to update the three rows that currently point to 6112 to point to this
document instead (or at least in addition to 6112)?
Micro-nit: There is a 2119 MUST carried forward from RFC6112 that could
be improved if the group is willing. "Care MUST be taken by the TGS to
not reveal". I would suggest "The TGS MUST NOT reveal...". If you need
to further highlight care, add a sentence that says "Implementers need
to be particularly careful when addressing this requirement." It is a
very small nit - please feel free to ignore it.
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
