I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
For more information, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-14 Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review Date: 10/26/16 IETF LC End Date: 8/10/16 IESG Telechat date: 10/28/16 Summary: Ready. The more important issue in my initial review was clarified in draft-14. Two minor issues were not, but these are not essential. Major issues: Minor issues: 1. The use of B – ‘Both’ terminology used to indicate that an attribute is specified S – Session Level and M – Medial Level (e.g. in Section 5) may be confusing, as there is a third possible level SR – Source Level. Actually S + M would probably be more clear. 2. Section 5.54 includes a note referring to the TBD content. ‘As per section 9.1 of [I-D.ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation], there exists no publicly available specification that defines procedures for multiplexing/demultiplexing fax protocols flows over a single 5-tuple. Once such a specification is available, the multiplexing category assignments for the attributes in this section could be revisited.’ Assuming the missing specification will be publicly available sometime in the future – how will this information be added? Revise this RFC? The question applies to other TBD marked in the ‘Mux Category’ column of the tables in Section 5 (in 5.42, 5.44, …) Nits/editorial comments: Regards, Dan
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
