Hi Julien,
What you propose below is what I was thinking about. So yes, OK with that.
Thanks,
Jouni
> On Dec 7, 2016, at 1:19 PM, Julien ÉLIE <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Jouni,
>
> First of all, thanks for having taken time to review the document.
>
>
>> I think this document is ready for publication.
>>
>> I have comment, which is just a suggestion concerning document
>> structure. Currently the updates/changes to RFC4642 are listed in
>> Introduction. On the other hand there is a specific section for
>> recommendations. I would move the updates/changes to RFC4642 into its
>> own section just to make the document a bit more structured.
>
> Is it OK if I move from Section 1 "Introduction", the part "Notably, this
> document updates [RFC4642]... of [RFC7525] instead." to a new Section 2
> "Updates/Changes to RFC 4642"?
> I'll then drop "Notably" in the pasted wording, and mention that detailed
> changes are listed in Appendix A of the document.
> The "Recommendations" Section becomes Section 3, and so on.
>
> Or did you have something else in mind?
>
> Thanks again,
>
> --
> Julien ÉLIE
>
> « – Tu n'as rien remarqué d'étrange chez cet Arverne ?
> – Oui, son accent. » (Astérix)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
