Hi Fernando,
There's a ticket open for adding the template:
https://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/ticket/2075
As for the preview, everything that's provided in the "Review Content"
field goes into the body of the message. Datatracker doesn't add
anything to it. When the template is added, it will be displayed in the
"Review Content" field.
Thanks!
Jean
On 12/16/16 3:54 PM, Fernando Gont wrote:
Folks,
I'm almost sure I saw a discussion of this somewhere, but... anyway:
would it be possible to have the review tool automatically insert the
gen-art "boiler-plate"? Besides, would it be possible to preview what's
going to be sent by email (and e.g., allow for confirmation)?
Thanks!
Best regards,
Fernando
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Review of
draft-holmberg-dispatch-mcptt-rp-namespace-03
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 18:48:59 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected], [email protected]
Folks,
Apologies: wasn't sure whether the tool would insert the "boilerplate",
so... here it is:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any
other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Here's my review:
On 12/16/2016 06:46 PM, Fernando Gont wrote:
Reviewer: Fernando Gont
Review result: Ready with Nits
** Technical **
* Section 3, pages 3-4:
Intended algorithm for mcpttq is queuing.
New Warning cde: No.
New SIP response code: No.
Is this kind of thing really needed/required in the registry?
** Editorial **
* Section 1, page 2:
The third generation partnership project (3GPP)
May be you should capitalize these? (i.e., "Third Generation...")
* Section 1, page 2:
In addition to this a commercial PTT
service for non-professional use (e.g., groups of people on
holiday)
Please insert a comma after "this".
* Section 1, page 3:
MCPTT data transfer currently under development can
benefit from a queueing mechanism.
"data transfer..." protocols?
* Section 2, page 3:
The use of this namespace outside such network is
undefined.
s/network/networks/
* Section 5, page 5:
5. IANA Considerations
Abiding by the rules established within [RFC4412] and [RFC7134],
this
is an Informative RFC registering two new namespaces, their
associated priority-values, and intended algorithms.
s/registering/creating/ ?
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
