Hi Jari

I’ll review the comments and respond to them.

Thanks,

Bill Cerveny

On 2/16/17, 7:47 AM, "Jari Arkko" <jari.ar...@piuha.net> wrote:

    Thanks for the detailed review, Francis!
    
    Authors — did you make a note of the comments? Did not see a response…
    
    Jari
    
    On 24 Jan 2017, at 18:33, Francis Dupont <francis.dup...@fdupont.fr> wrote:
    
    > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
    > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
    > by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
    > like any other last call comments.
    > 
    > For more information, please see the FAQ at
    > 
    > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
    > 
    > Document: draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-nd-04.txt
    > Reviewer: Francis Dupont
    > Review Date: 20170116
    > IETF LC End Date: 20170123
    > IESG Telechat date: unknown
    > 
    > Summary: Ready with nits
    > 
    > Major issues: none
    > 
    > Minor issues: the title (and the Abstract) is a bit misleading: it is
    > not the benchmarking of the ND protocol which has ~12 different
    > functions but the benchmarking of a particular function on a router.
    > Now it is the critical one so my concern is more the document is
    > limited to only this one...
    > 
    > Nits/editorial comments:
    > - ToC page 2 and 7 page 12: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments
    > 
    > - 1 page 2: the limit to a router explains why the verb send is
    >  replaced by forward... and why there is nothing about redirection
    > 
    > - 1 page 2: determine the IPv6 next-hop's link-layer address
    >  -> determine the outgoing interface and the IPv6 next-hop's
    >   link-layer address
    > 
    > - 2.2.1 page 5: et cetera -> etc
    > 
    > - 3.1.2 page 9 (twice) and 3.2.2 page 10; recieved -> received
    > 
    > - 3.1.2 page 9: IMHO you should define the "initial" term (for final
    >  the meaning is obvious)
    > 
    > - 3.2.1 page 10: (i.e.,IPv6 -> (i.e., IPv6
    > 
    > - 3.2.2 page 10: in "packets-received will either be
    >   equal to zero or packets-received." the last received -> sent.
    > 
    > Regards
    > 
    > francis.dup...@fdupont.fr
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > Gen-art mailing list
    > Gen-art@ietf.org
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
    
    

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to