Francis, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot position.
Alissa > On May 17, 2017, at 8:39 AM, Francis Dupont <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-freytag-lager-variant-rules-05.txt > Reviewer: Francis Dupont > Review Date: 20170516 > IETF LC End Date: 20170515 > IESG Telechat date: unknown > > Summary: Ready with Nits > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > - 1 page 2: as the document cannot be understood without reading the > RFC 7940 the reference to RFC 79040 must be moved as early as > possible (I suggest just after the LGRs introduction and the warning > "However, the reader is expected to have some familiarity..." emphased > and moved to earlier in the section. > (I already raised thos concern at my first review, it wasn't fixed > but for this second review I had the 82 pages of RFC 7940 with me :-) > > Regards > > [email protected] > > PS: I don't think it will work for the languages I used but it is > an information document based on some experiments so what matters > is it can help even it is not for general cases... > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
