Hi Jonathan, I did not see the text you added yet as a response to my first question So to better clarify my question . If the FCI has TTID=0 and TLID=2 . does it mean that it is a request to update both? This was also the reason for the question about both TTID=0 and TLID=0, which layer need update or is it both? Can you say that you want just to update temporal or spatial?
Roni > -----Original Message----- > From: Gen-art [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jonathan > Lennox > Sent: יום ד 07 יוני 2017 00:30 > To: Roni Even > Cc: [email protected]; General Area Review Team; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-avtext-lrr-05 > > Hi, Roni — thanks for your review. Responses inline. > > > On Jun 1, 2017, at 2:53 AM, Roni Even <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Reviewer: Roni Even > > Review result: Ready with Issues > > > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by > > the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like > > any other last call comments. > > > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > > > Document: draft-ietf-avtext-lrr-?? > > Reviewer: Roni Even > > Review Date: 2017-05-31 > > IETF LC End Date: 2017-06-08 > > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > > > Summary: > > The document is ready with issues for a standard track RFC Major > > issues: > > > > Minor issues: > > > > 1. Can you specify both TTID and TLID in the same FCI. > > Syntactically, they must both occur. > > If you mean can you request an upgrade in both at once, yes; I’ve added text > to clarify this. > > > 2. What is the meaning of value 0 for TTID and TLID - TID or LID =0 in > > frame marking draft means base layer if there is scalability. > > This relates to the previous question. > > I’m not sure I understand this question. > > I’ve added text that if C=1, at least one of <TTID, TLID> MUST be greater than > <CTID, CLID>, and both MUST be greater than or equal to their counterpart, > so the LRR is actually requesting a layer upgrade. Is that what you were > asking about? > > > 3. What would an FCI with both TTID and TLID equal 0 mean. > > It means you want a refresh of the base temporal/spatial layer, only. > > > Nits/editorial comments: > > > > 1. Section 3 "an Real-Time Transport Control Protocol" should be "a > > Real…". > > Colin pointed out that it should say “an RTP Control Protocol” anyway. > > > 2. In section 3 " [RFC5104](Section 3.5.1)" there is a link to section > > 3.5.1 but it does not work. > > xml2rfc doesn’t have any way to link to sections of other documents, so the > “(Section 3.5.1)” part is just a comment. > > I think the internet-draft tooling may have thought I was trying to link to a > non-existent section 3.5.1 of this document, but that’s outside my control. > > > 3. In section 3.2 "(see section Section 2.1)" section appears twice. > > Fixed. > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
