Roni, thanks for your review. Mike, thanks for making the edits. I entered a No Objection ballot position.
Alissa > On Jun 19, 2017, at 1:01 AM, Roni Even <[email protected]> wrote: > > Mike, > Thanks, look OK to me now > Roni > > From: Gen-art [mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Mike Jones > Sent: יום ו 16 יוני 2017 05:16 > To: Roni Even; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>; Kathleen Moriarty; [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>; Eric Rescorla > Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-jones-cose-rsa-03 > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-cose-rsa-04 > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-cose-rsa-04> addresses your review > comments, Roni. Thanks for the useful review! > > -- Mike > > P.S. I also thanked you in the publication announcement at > http://self-issued.info/?p=1697 <http://self-issued.info/?p=1697> and as > @selfissued <https://twitter.com/selfissued>. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Roni Even [mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>] > Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2017 9:05 PM > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Genart telechat review of draft-jones-cose-rsa-03 > > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD > before posting a new version of the draft. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>>. > > Document: draft-jones-cose-rsa-?? > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review Date: 2017-05-21 > IETF LC End Date: 2017-06-15 > IESG Telechat date: 2017-06-22 > > Summary: The document is ready for publication as standard track RFC with nits > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > Nits/editorial comments: > > 1. Section 3 first paragraph "can be find" should be "can be found" > > 2. IANA 5.1 table 1 and 2 missing recommended colum > > 3. IANA 5.3 table 4 the title is not "value" but "label" > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
