Thanks for the review! > Am 24.05.2017 um 18:49 schrieb Stewart Bryant <[email protected]>: > > Reviewer: Stewart Bryant > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-nottingham-rfc5988bis-?? > Reviewer: Stewart Bryant > Review Date: 2017-05-24 > IETF LC End Date: 2017-05-26 > IESG Telechat date: 2017-06-08 > > Summary: > This is a well written document, and ready for publication. > > I found an IANA consideration a little confusing, but I am sure that > either IANA understand it or will ask for clarification. > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > I found the IANA considerations confusing. Specifically it looks like > Section 4.1 refers to > https://www.iana.org/assignments/message-headers/message-headers.xhtml > although it does not say so in so many words. > > Assuming that to be the case the IANA text in section 4.1 (which > copies the text from RFC5688) > does not line up column by column with the text in the registry. I > assume that > [RFC&rfc.number;] means [This RFC], but do not see where Author/Change > control fits in the > registry. > > Nits/editorial comments: > > In the intro and the abstract the text "a model for indicate the > relationships" is not good grammar. >
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
