From: Pete Resnick <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Thursday, August 24, 2017 at 3:59 PM To: Acee Lindem <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: Xiaohu Xu <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, OSPF WG List <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: 答复: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06 Resent-From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Resent-To: Xiaohu Xu <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Bruno Decraene <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Robert Raszuk <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Luis Contreras <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Luay Jalil <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Acee Lindem <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Deborah Brungard <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Alia Atlas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Acee Lindem <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Resent-Date: Thursday, August 24, 2017 at 3:59 PM
On 24 Aug 2017, at 11:24, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: For 1, 2, 6, and 7, that's easy; the drafts defining the values can do the registrations. For 5, the reference would be to an existing RFC that doesn't do the registration. I'm not sure what to do about that; perhaps register it here and make the reference both 5640 and this document. Actually, this document does assign these code points in the registry so “This document” is appropriate. The value portion of these TLVs just happened to be described via a reference rather than text. There is nothing preventing the IANA registry from having useful information. :-) Yes, this document registers it, but really what the implementer is going to need is this document and 5640, so I see no particular harm in putting both references in the registry, and it's probably useful. Ok – I think I found an example of where something like this was done (although only for IS-IS TLVs ;^). https://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-ls-parameters/bgp-ls-parameters.xhtml#node-descriptor-link-descriptor-prefix-descriptor-attribute-tlv Authors – can you cross-reference the document defining the value in the table? We’re not going to move any IANA allocations. Thanks, Acee pr -- Pete Resnick http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/<http://www.qualcomm.com/%7Epresnick/> Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
