Hi Roni, thanks for the review!
> Am 13.08.2017 um 15:47 schrieb Roni Even <[email protected]>: > > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-?? > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review Date: 2017-08-13 > IETF LC End Date: 2017-08-24 > IESG Telechat date: 2017-08-31 > > Summary: The document is ready for publication as standard track RFC > > I read all the document and also did a compare with RFC6006 to look at the > changes. > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > Nits/editorial comments: > > 1. In section 4.2 I am not sure why is this sentence there, is it for the > current yang document or for a future one. Why have it at all?-"The PCEP YANG > module [I-D.ietf-pce-pcep-yang] can be extended to also include the P2MP > related parameters." > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
