Thanks for doing the update.
- Stewart
On 20/09/2017 15:00, Dave Cridland wrote:
shakespeare.example is a fine domain to use - the XMPP community
(mostly due to Peter Saint-Andre) has used these inventive domains to
express examples with more clarity - montague.lit, capulet.lit, and so
on provide usefully recognisable domains. But .example is just as good
as .lit, and just as clear.
On 20 Sep 2017 14:39, "Steve Kille" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Stewart,
These Shakespearean style addresses are conventionally used in
XMPP XEPs, and I followed that style here.
I've discussed with XMPP colleagues, and we agree that although
the convention is cool, you are right that a safe address should
be used.
I have fixed this in 06, which I just submitted
Regards
Steve
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>]
> Sent: 20 September 2017 11:56
> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Genart last call review of draft-kille-ldap-xmpp-schema-05
>
> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General
Area Review
> Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG for
> the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other
last call
> comments.
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>>.
>
> Document: draft-kille-ldap-xmpp-schema-05
> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review Date: 2017-09-20
> IETF LC End Date: 2017-09-27
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>
> Summary: A well written document, however it uses an example email
> address that might be allocated in the future, rather than one
for the
> example range.
>
> Major issues: None
>
> Minor issues:
>
> "[email protected] representing a user) "
>
> That is a really cool example! However I can imagine .lit
eventually being
> allocated so we ought to use one of the RFC6761 example TLDs.
>
> Nits/editorial comments: None
>
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
