Francis, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa
> On Oct 24, 2017, at 5:54 PM, Francis Dupont <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-06.txt > Reviewer: Francis Dupont > Review Date: 20171024 > IETF LC End Date: 20171024 > IESG Telechat date: unknown > > Summary: Ready > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > - 1.1 page 3: please upgrade the 2119 section to RFC 8174 > (it is not yet an enforced policy but it is at least strongly > recommended. BTW if you don't need to update the document for > another reason you can leave this at RFC Editor's discretion) > > - 4.1 and 4.2 page 5 (5 occurrences): xxx bits value -> xxx bit value > > - 6 page 7: I am afraid the logic behind this option for DHCPv6 (*) > is not very understable before this example. Unfortunately I both > know well this document and DHCP protocols so I can't say if I am > right and/or if it is a real problem (i.e. for the second if it can > be a problem for intended readers)... Perhaps not DHCP specialists > reading the document will help? > > Thanks > > [email protected] > > PS (*): DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 use relays for very different purposes: DHCPv4 > relays are only for allowing out of local link servers, DHCPv6 relays > have other uses (this is why DHCPv6 relays can be cascaded) in particular > for prefix delegation (which is specific to DHCPv6) as embedded relay > in clients or spoofing relays (I actively pushed these two ideas :-). > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
