Francis, thanks for your review. I have entered a Yes ballot. Alissa
> On Oct 9, 2017, at 8:56 AM, Francis Dupont <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-dawkins-iesg-nomcom-advisor-iaoc-03.txt > Reviewer: Francis Dupont > Review Date: 20170929 > IETF LC End Date: 20171016 > IESG Telechat date: unknown > > Summary: Ready > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > - ToC page 2 and 7 page 4: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments > > - about A.1 page 5: I agree it can be critical to have flexibility > in the text establishing rules. As you know the French law is > fully written down so this principle verifies each time a new > question happens. For instance the first time a judge had to decide > about software ownership he asked how a program was presented and > simply applied the law about texts even a program is not a novel > because the law about texts is about texts in general. Of course > this was changed by dedicated laws a few years after (unfortunately > because the author of a text has a lot of rights, i.e. it was pretty > good for programmers). > > - A.2 page 6: in [RFC7437],Section 4.6 > ^ add a space after the comma > > - A.3 page 7: sufficent -> sufficient and qualiified -> qualified > > Regards > > [email protected] _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
