Stewart, thank you for your reviews. I have entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa
> On Jan 9, 2018, at 12:12 PM, Stewart Bryant <[email protected]> wrote: > > Reviewer: Stewart Bryant > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your > document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-teas-network-assigned-upstream-label-11 > Reviewer: Stewart Bryant > Review Date: 2018-01-09 > IETF LC End Date: 2017-12-29 > IESG Telechat date: 2018-01-11 > > Summary: This is ready for publication. I think it would be useful to consider > whether a magic number other than all ones is more robust, but this is very > much a matter of design preference. > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: None > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
