Joel, thanks for your review. I agree with your comment. I entered a DISCUSS ballot as I’m a bit unclear what this spec is achieving.
Alissa > On Feb 26, 2018, at 6:01 PM, Donald Eastlake <d3e...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Joel, > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Joel Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com > <mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com>> wrote: > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your > document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>>. > > Document: draft-ietf-trill-vendor-channel-00 > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review Date: 2018-02-26 > IETF LC End Date: 2018-03-06 > IESG Telechat date: 2018-03-08 > > Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard > > Major issues: N/A > > Minor issues: N/A > > Nits/editorial comments: > Why does the acknowledgements say: > "The document was prepared in raw nroff. All macros used were defined > within the source file." > ? > > Why not? It's true. I've seen a number of draft with credit in them for MS > Word templates and the like. Shouldn't people know their are still drafts > being prepared with nroff? > > Thanks, > Donald > =============================== > Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) > 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA > d3e...@gmail.com <mailto:d3e...@gmail.com> > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Genfirstname.lastname@example.org <mailto:Genemail@example.com> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Genfirstname.lastname@example.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art