On 4/1/18 11:09 PM, Zhuangyan (Yan) wrote:
Hi Paul,

Thank you very much for your review and comments.
Some responses below.

Best Regards,

Yan

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2018 1:20 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: General Area Review Team <[email protected]>
Subject: Gen-ART Telechat review of 
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topology-07

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team 
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. 
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new 
version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at 
<​http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topology-07
Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat
Review Date: 2018-03-31
IETF LC End Date: 2018-04-03
IESG Telechat date: 2018-04-05

Summary:

This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be 
fixed before publication.

Disclaimer:

I conducted this review without any knowledge of YANG modeling. So the sort of 
review I can do is superficial.

Issues:

Major: 0
Minor: 0
Nits:  4

(1) NIT:

In my opinion many of the normative references aren't actually normative, and 
can/should be changed to informative references. In particular the following 
all seem likely candidates: RFC5246 (TLS),
RFC6241 and RFC6242 (NETCONF), RFC8040 (RESTCONF), RFC8342 (NMDA), RFC8346. 
There may be others.
[Yan] For RFC5246 (TLS), RFC6241, RFC6242 (NETCONF), RFC8040 (RESTCONF) and 
RFC8342 (NMDA), they are building blocks for YANG module usage and definition, 
hence referenced as normative.

I get your point, but as best I can tell there is no normative dependency on any of them. They are all *possible* substrates for using this work, but none of them are required.

But it is your call.

(3) NIT:

IdNits reports 3 errors and 7 warnings, regarding long lines, references that 
are missing, unused, obsolete, and a downref. Please fix the errors and review 
the warnings.
[Yan] I checked v-07 with idnits 2.15.01, there is no errors/warnings or nits 
found...can you direct me to the tool you use?

I'm sorry. I actually reviewed -08, even though my message said I reviewed -07. I looked at the HTMLized version:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topology-08

and then cliced [Nits] at the top:

https://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topology-08.txt

        Thanks,
        Paul

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to