Sorry, trying to get through backlog. Took longer than expected... On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 01:04:53AM +0100, Elwyn Davies wrote: > Hi. > It has been about 6 weeks since responses to the review were postponed till > after IETF 101.... any thoughts yet? > Regards,Elwyn > > > Sent from Samsung tablet. > -------- Original message --------From: Elwyn Davies <elw...@dial.pipex.com> > Date: 02/03/2018 12:04 (GMT+00:00) To: Brian E Carpenter > <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com>, gen-art@ietf.org Cc: > draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane....@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Gen-art] > Gen-art LC Review of > draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-13 > Just taking up one point for the time being.... > Even if the reference model is informational, I was relying on RFC 8067, s1, > para 3: > Section 2 of [RFC3967] lists some conditions under which downrefs may > make sense. In addition to those, it has become common for working > groups to produce foundational documents (which contain important > information such as terminology definitions and architectural design > and considerations) at Informational status, and those documents are > often needed as normative references in the Standards Track protocol > documents that follow. > I would say that sombody implementing ACP really needs to have read and > understood the reference model and so I would argue:1. That it needs to be > normative,and2. The downref is sanctioned by the language in RFC 8067. > I am on holiday for a week and others are fighting the draft deadline so > perhaps we can postpone discussion of the other points until the draft panic > has subsided. > Cheers,Elwyn > Sent from Samsung tablet.
-- --- t...@cs.fau.de _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
