Brian, >>> 4. Section 4 - It would be good to capitalize Standards Action, and refer to >>> RFC 8126 as reference (also to be added) >> >> Capitalisation done. >> I ended up leaning towards not referencing 8126. As most documents with IANA >> considerations don't. To be consistent. > > Really? As an author, I think I've always cited RFC8126 or its predecessors > when > defining an assignment policy. "Standards Action" may be self-defining, but > certainly the more subtle policies like "Specification Required" need a > reference.
Good point. For the assignment policy I agree. (I was for some reason thinking IANA Considerations in general). I will update. Best regards, Ole
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
