Robert, thanks for your review. Rachel, thanks for the edit. I have entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa > On May 1, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Huangyihong (Rachel) <rachel.hu...@huawei.com> > wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > I believe I have responded you in February, if you check the mail archive of > xrblock. > > Follows was my response before. And I uploaded a new version to reflect that > since I didn't get your further email. Sorry for assuming that you received > my response. > > " > Hi Robert, > > Thanks for the comment. > > I propose to change the last paragraph of 5.2.2 from > > " > The following metrics can also be considered for WebRTC's Statistics > API: number of discarded key frames, number of lost key frames, > number of discarded derived frames, number of lost derived frames. > These metrics can be used to calculate Media Loss Rate (MLR) of MDI. > Details of the definition of these metrics are described in > [RFC7003]. Additionally, the metric provides the rendered frame > rate, an important parameter for quality estimation. > " > > To > > " > The metrics in this category includes > : number of discarded key frames, number of lost key frames, > number of discarded derived frames, number of lost derived frames. > These metrics can be used to calculate Media Loss Rate (MLR) of MDI. > Details of the definition of these metrics are described in > [RFC7003]. Additionally, the metric provides the rendered frame > rate, an important parameter for quality estimation. > " > > This change is to just talk about the metrics itself, so as to avoid any > confusion that readers may have. The fact is that the W3C has already > included the metrics, and made an informational reference to this document. > > If the proposal looks good to you, we'll reflect it in the new version. > > " > > BR, > Rachel > > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: Robert Sparks [mailto:rjspa...@nostrum.com] > 发送时间: 2018年5月2日 0:04 > 收件人: gen-art@ietf.org > 抄送: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics....@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; > xrbl...@ietf.org > 主题: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-09 > > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD > before posting a new version of the draft. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-09 > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review Date: 2018-05-01 > IETF LC End Date: 2018-02-23 > IESG Telechat date: 2018-05-24 > > Summary: Ready for publication as an Informational RFC, but with nits to > consider before publication > > Note that this is identical to my last call review, which I don't think I've > seen a response to. > > The document argues to include things in the W3C statistics API in the last > paragraph of 5.2.2. Section 7 seems to say those have been included already. > It would be good to rework both of these mentions to reflect what's true at > the time of the publication of the RFC, in a way that the text will make > sense when read years from now. > > _______________________________________________ > xrblock mailing list > xrbl...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
