Linda, thanks for your review. Yuval, thanks for your response. I have entered a DISCUSS ballot to clarify a few things based on my own review.
Alissa > On May 6, 2018, at 4:42 AM, Yuval Lifshitz <[email protected]> wrote: > > Section 4 does not use normative language that dictates the *only* source for > rating would be the CC-client. As the act of rating is done on the CC-server > it may take into account other factors (for e.g. may fetch the subscriber's > tier from an external system and use it together with service ID coming from > the CC-Client to do the rating). However, if the rating input comes entirely > from a different source (e.g. consumption of offline UDRs) then we cannot say > that the above spec is implemented, as the concepts of online-charging is > pivotal to the protocol between the CC-Client and CC-Server. > > Yuval > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
