Hi Alissa
Yes, we will address all review comments that we receive.
- Stewart
On 18/06/2018 18:44, Alissa Cooper wrote:
Brian, thanks for your review. Andy, thanks for your response;
hopefully it means Brian’s comments will be addressed? I have entered
a No Objection ballot.
Alissa
On Jun 12, 2018, at 1:50 PM, Andrew G. Malis <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Brian,
Thanks, your comments are much appreciated.
Cheers,
Andy
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 11:30 PM, Brian Carpenter
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review result: Ready with Nits
Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-pals-ethernet-cw-06
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>>.
Document: draft-ietf-pals-ethernet-cw-06.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2018-06-12
IETF LC End Date: 2018-06-15
IESG Telechat date: 2018-06-21
Summary: Ready with nits
--------
Comments:
---------
This (with RFC4928) is a wonderful example of why layer
violations are a Bad Thing.
Nits:
-----
> 1. Introduction
....
> This document recommends the use of the Ethernet pseudowire
control
> word in all but exceptional circumstances.
That's wrong, it *mandates* this usage with a MUST (first
paragraph of section 4).
> 3. Background
....
> A recent posting on the Nanog email list has highlighted this
> problem:
>
>
https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2016-December/089395.html
<https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2016-December/089395.html>
No, it's no longer recent. How about:
For example, a posting on the Nanog email list highlighted this
problem:
> 7. Operational Considerations
>
> CW presence on the PW is controlled by the configuration and
may be
> subject to default operational mode of not being enabled.
That sentence is hard to parse. Try this:
A configuration switch might determine whether the CW is used
on the PW.
The default configuration might be to disable use of the CW.
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
