Erik, thanks for your review. Martin, thanks for your response. I agree that 
“checksum” is a misnomer here and don’t really understand why it was picked, 
but at least the text explains that it isn’t a checksum. I entered a No 
Objection ballot.

Alissa

> On Oct 1, 2018, at 3:08 AM, Martin Bjorklund <m...@tail-f.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thank you for your review!  Comments inline.
> 
> Erik Kline <ek=40google....@dmarc.ietf.org 
> <mailto:ek=40google....@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
>> Reviewer: Erik Kline
>> Review result: Ready
>> 
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
>> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
>> like any other last call comments.
>> 
>> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>> 
>> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>> 
>> Document: draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06
>> Reviewer: Erik Kline
>> Review Date: 2018-06-30
>> IETF LC End Date: 2018-06-28
>> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>> 
>> Summary: ready
>> 
>> Major issues: none
>> 
>> Minor issues: none
>> 
>> Nits/editorial comments: 
>> 
>> Conceptually, the "checksum" isn't a checksum so much as just a unique
>> identifier. The text in Section 3 text generally seems to acknowledge
>> this (even using checksum in quotation marks), and so I'm left wondering
>> whether "checksum" is really the best name.
>> 
>> I've no strong opinion, just this observation, and nothing that should
>> impede this document (I assume bike-shedding may have already occurred).
> 
> Yes; this used to be called just an "identifier", but people found it
> confusing and it was always referred to as the checksum...
> 
>> Section 2, item 4 "more than one datastores" -> "more than one datastore".
> 
> Fixed.
> 
>> Section 4, I believe ietf-datastores reference can be updated to RFC 8342,
>> if I understand things correctly.
> 
> Fixed.
> 
>> Section 4, Author list entry for Rob Wilton lacks "mailto:"; before the
>> email address.
> 
> Fixed.
> 
> 
> 
> /martin
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org <mailto:Gen-art@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art 
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to