Paul, thanks for your review. Les, thanks for your response. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa > On Dec 9, 2018, at 6:08 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Paul - > > Thanx for the careful review and the kind words. > > Les > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> >> Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2018 12:06 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: General Area Review Team <[email protected]> >> Subject: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-03 >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the >> IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other >> last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at >> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> >> Document: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-03 >> Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat >> Review Date: 2018-12-09 >> IETF LC End Date: 2018-12-12 >> IESG Telechat date: ? >> >> Summary: >> >> This draft is ready for publication as a Standards Track RFC. >> >> Issues: None >> >> It was very easy to review this document because a diff with RFC7810 >> showed me everything of note, and this was consistent with Appendix A. >> >> Changing an RFC in a way that is not backwards compatible is >> problematic, but the authors have clearly considered the issues and find >> this the best of bad alternatives. >> >> The reference to draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-14 is now out of date. I'm not >> raising it as a nit because chasing references to drafts is futile and >> this will be fixed by the editor. > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
