> On Mar 18, 2019, at 8:31 AM, Barry Leiba <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, Dan. Thanks for the review, and I’m sorry you didn’t get a response to > your question before.
Indeed, this document got moved to a later telechat and in the midst of that I failed to thank you for your reviews, Dan. I entered a Yes ballot. IANA had been tracking this for some time so I believe the instructions are clear. Alissa > > Last part first: IANA does not normally make changes until the document is > approved, and this is not an exception. > > The changes to the derived property values are described in detail in the > text in Section 3. The designated expert will need to check all that and > generate a list of specific chaanges to the table here: > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/idna-tables-6.3.0/#idna-tables-properties > <https://www.iana.org/assignments/idna-tables-6.3.0/#idna-tables-properties> > ...and IANA will then apply those changes. > > Barry > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 3:31 AM Dan Romascanu via Datatracker > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Reviewer: Dan Romascanu > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your > document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>>. > > Document: draft-faltstrom-unicode11-08 > Reviewer: Dan Romascanu > Review Date: 2019-03-18 > IETF LC End Date: 2019-03-05 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > > This document is Ready. However, I have signaled one minor issue in my LC > review which was not addressed in the revision, neither have I seen an answer > to the clarification that I requested (unless I missed some mail). > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > (from my previous review, not addressed) > > The IANA Considerations text is not clear to me. > > > IANA is requested to update the IDNA Parameters registry of derived > property values, after the expert reviewer validates that the derived > property values are calculated correctly. > > What does this exactly say? Are these recommendations for future actions, or > do > they refer specifically to property values described in this document? Are the > expert reviewer validation and IDNA Parameters registry update required to be > performed prior to approval of this document? > > Nits/editorial comments: > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
