Hi Alissa/Joel, Thanks for your review. I've accepted and updated the draft for Joel's editorial comment below.
A v19 of the draft has just been posted which includes these changes along with others that I had pending in my buffer from Alvaro's AD review and other IESG last call reviews. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-19 Thanks, Ketan -----Original Message----- From: Alissa Cooper <[email protected]> Sent: 15 May 2019 20:58 To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <[email protected]>; Joel Halpern <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-18 Joel, thanks for your review. Ketan, thanks for your response. I entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Apr 8, 2019, at 2:06 AM, Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Joel, > > Thanks for your review. I've taken note of the nit that you pointed out (it > was also pointed by Alvaro on his review of v18). I have it in my edit buffer > and will include in the next update. > > Thanks, > Ketan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joel Halpern via Datatracker <[email protected]> > Sent: 07 April 2019 08:22 > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected] > Subject: Genart last call review of > draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-18 > > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call > comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-18 > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review Date: 2019-04-06 > IETF LC End Date: 2019-04-17 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC. > > Major issues: N/A > > Minor issues: N/A > > Nits/editorial comments: > Section 3 begins "his section". I expect that should be "This section". > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
