Hi Roni, I think we wrote this part some time ago...So what about the following:
"an example of change policy is to change the MAC address of the OCB interface each time the system boots up" On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 2:25 PM Roni Even (A) <roni.e...@huawei.com> wrote: > Thanks, > > The only comment left is: > > > 2. In section 5.2 "The policy dictating when the MAC address is changed on > the > 802.11-OCB interface is to-be-determined.". Reading the next sentence it > looks > to me that this is needed as part of the solution and should not be left > for > the unknown future. > > > > Should we reformulate here? > > > > I was expecting some recommendation since the changing of MAC address is > important to address privacy issues (discussed in section 5). Currently it > is left open with no recommendation , only saying that dynamic change of > MAC address is needed. > > Maybe the document should have some normative language for example in > section 5.1 that will say that IP-OBU MUST dynamic change their MAC > addresses > > > > Did the document go through security area review? > > > > Roni > > > > > > *From:* Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *NABIL > BENAMAR > *Sent:* Monday, June 17, 2019 12:48 PM > *To:* Roni Even > *Cc:* gen-art@ietf.org; IETF Discussion; i...@ietf.org; > draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb....@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of > draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-46 > > > > Dear Roni, > > > > Thank you for your review. > > Please, see my answers below. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 16, 2019, 09:52 Roni Even via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> > wrote: > > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review result: Almost Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-?? > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review Date: 2019-06-16 > IETF LC End Date: 2019-06-26 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > The document is almost ready for publication as a standard track RFC > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > 1. Section 4.2 says "IP packets MUST be transmitted over 802.11-OCB media > as > QoS Data" while appendix F say "The STA may send data frames of subtype > Data, > Null, QoS Data, and > QoS Null. > > > > I will update the appendix to reflect the text in section 4.2. > > > 2. In section 5.2 "The policy dictating when the MAC address is changed on > the > 802.11-OCB interface is to-be-determined.". Reading the next sentence it > looks > to me that this is needed as part of the solution and should not be left > for > the unknown future. > > > > Should we reformulate here? > > > 3. In Appendix I 4th paragraph " However, this does not apply if TBD TBD > TBD. " > .. What are the TBDs? > > > > The whole sentence will be removed. > > > Nits/editorial comments: > 1. In appendix I last paragraph "Support of RFC 8505 is may be implemented > on > OCB." should be "Support of RFC 8505 may be implemented on OCB." 2. In > Appendix > I "OCB nodes that support RFC 8505 would support the 6LN operation in > order to > act as a host". I think that instead of "would" it should be "should" > also if > this is a recommendation why not have this paragraph not in an appendix > with > "MAY" and "SHOULD > > > > > > Agreed. > > > > -- Best Regards Nabil Benamar Associate Professor Department of Computer Sciences School of Technology Moulay Ismail University Meknes. Morocco
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
