Thanks Dan. I've pushed a commit with your suggestions: https://github.com/jech/babel-drafts/commit/8d6a6fc05ce4c621b38d2c7621c4157300380078
We'll upload -06 at the end of this round of comments. David On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 11:41 AM Dan Romascanu <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the quick reply. > > See in-line. > > regards, > > Dan > > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 9:29 PM David Schinazi <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello Dan, and thanks for your review. Comments inline. >> >> 1. In section 2.1: >>> >>> > The default port >>> for Babel over DTLS is registered with IANA as the "babel-dtls" port >>> (UDP port TBD, see Section 4), and the port exchanging unencrypted >>> Babel traffic is registered as the "babel" port (UDP port 6696). >>> >>> A reference would be desirable here. >>> >> >> What reference do you have in mind? This paragraph already has a >> reference to Section 4 (IANA Considerations). >> > > the section in the Babel spec that defines the "babel" port (UDP port > 6696, see ....) > > > >> >>> 2. In section 2.4 >>> >>> > Nodes MUST silently ignore any unprotected >>> packet sent over unicast. When parsing an unprotected packet, a node >>> MUST silently ignore all TLVs that are not of type Hello. Nodes MUST >>> also silently ignore any unprotected Hello with the Unicast flag set. >>> >>> Is the last sentence necessary? Is this case not covered by the >>> statement in >>> the first sentence? >>> >> >> The Unicast flag is a bit in the Babel packet. This statement instructs >> nodes >> to ignore a Hello TLV which was received over multicast but has the >> unicast flag set. >> > > Thanks for the clarification. > > >> Thanks, >> David >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
