Juliusz: > Thank you very much for your review. I agree with all of your comments > save one, I'll publish a new revision taking your comments into account as > soon as possible. > >> ... A node SHOULD NOT send triggered updates >> for other reasons, such as when there is a minor fluctuation in a >> route's metric, when the selected next hop changes, or to propagate a >> new sequence number (except to satisfy a request, as specified in >> Section 3.8). > >> This seem backwards to me. Perhaps: > >> ... The node MUST send triggered updates to satisfy a request, as >> specified in Section 3.8; however, a node SHOULD NOT send >> triggered updates for other reasons, including a minor fluctuation >> in a metric for a route, the selected next hop changes, or to >> propagate a new sequence number. > > I disagree. The requirement to send triggered updates is already present > in 3.8.1.1, we should not repeat it. This section is concerned with > avoiding excessive noise.
I defer to your experience. Russ _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
