Hi, On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 1:03 PM Fred Baker <fredbaker.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for your review. I have some points I'd like to discuss in order to > understand better how to fix them. > > > On Jul 4, 2019, at 1:47 PM, Pete Resnick via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> > > wrote: > > > > Reviewer: Pete Resnick > > Review result: Ready with Nits > > > > ... > > > > Nits/editorial comments: > > > > In Section 2.1 and 2.2, Instead of "set to one" and "set to zero", it would > > read easier with "set to (1)" and "set to (0)", or some similar > > construction. > > That seems to me to be stylistic - I'm not at all sure what makes "(1)" more > readable than "one". I'm making the change, but I can't begin to fathom how > it improves the document.
I don't care between "one" and "1" or "zero" and "0" (although it should be consistent) but I find that the addition of these parenthesis distracting and confusing. Perhaps they are being recommended for consistency with the result of the document. I think the document would be improved without them and further improved with their removal in other instances where they already occur. Thanks, Donald =============================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 1424 Pro Shop Court, Davenport, FL 33896 USA d3e...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
