Peter, thanks for your review. Alvaro, thanks for your response. I see other ADs commented on Table 1 as well. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa > On Sep 5, 2019, at 1:34 AM, Alvaro Retana <[email protected]> wrote: > > [Author.] > > Peter: > > Thanks for the review! > > We’ll fold in changes as we get closer to the Telechat. > > Alvaro. > > On September 3, 2019 at 11:36:33 PM, Peter Yee via Datatracker > ([email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>) wrote: > >> Document: draft-ietf-pim-reserved-bits-03 >> Reviewer: Peter Yee >> Review Date: 2019-09-03 >> <http://airmail.calendar/2019-09-03%2012:00:00%20PDT> >> IETF LC End Date: 2019-09-03 >> <http://airmail.calendar/2019-09-03%2012:00:00%20PDT> >> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat >> >> Summary: This document clarifies use of the PIM message header Reserved bits >> and adds subtypes in order to extend the type space to allow for future >> usage. >> The expansion seems straightforward and reasonable. [Ready with Issues.] >> > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
