Pete, thanks for your review. I entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa
> On Sep 17, 2019, at 11:03 PM, Pete Resnick via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> > wrote: > > Reviewer: Pete Resnick > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your > document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-cbor-sequence-01 > Reviewer: Pete Resnick > Review Date: 2019-09-17 > IETF LC End Date: None > IESG Telechat date: 2019-09-19 > > Summary: > > Nice simple tight document. No concerns. (Having read the IESG comments, I > think Barry's clarification is nice.) > > Major issues: > > None. > > Minor issues: > > None. > > Nits/editorial comments: > > None. > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
