Paul, thanks for your review. Carlos, thanks for your response. I entered a No 
Objection ballot.

Alissa


> On Nov 1, 2019, at 8:06 AM, CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Dear Paul,
> 
> We've just posted a new revision (-14) addressing all your comments.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Carlos
> 
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 1:07 PM CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Dear Paul,
> 
> Thanks for the review.
> 
> We will fix the outdated references in the next version of the doc 
> (addressing also other directorate reviews that might arrive).
> 
> Carlos
> 
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 8:38 PM Paul Kyzivat <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-13
> Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat
> Review Date: 2019-10-12
> IETF LC End Date: 2019-10-14
> IESG Telechat date: ?
> 
> Summary:
> 
> This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should 
> be fixed before publication.
> 
> General:
> 
> I found that I lack the subject matter expertise to meaningfully review 
> this document. I read it carefully, along with one of the references. 
> But it appeared that I would need to internalize quite a number of other 
> references before it would be possible to really follow this.
> 
> I did review it for form - the document is well written. (Most documents 
> that I review have at least a few problems with form.)
> 
> IdNits returns a couple of outdated references that should be cleaned up:
> 
>    == Outdated reference: A later version (-18) exists of
>       draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-17
> 
>    == Outdated reference: A later version (-02) exists of
>       draft-ietf-rtgwg-atn-bgp-01
> 
> I have no other comments.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Special Issue "Beyond 5G Evolution": 
> https://www.mdpi.com/journal/electronics/special_issues/beyond_5g 
> <https://www.mdpi.com/journal/electronics/special_issues/beyond_5g>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Special Issue "Beyond 5G Evolution": 
> https://www.mdpi.com/journal/electronics/special_issues/beyond_5g 
> <https://www.mdpi.com/journal/electronics/special_issues/beyond_5g>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art 
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to