On Wed, 2020-03-18 at 12:56 -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
> ( warning: quote depth errors and top posting. keyur's mta, well
> let's
> not get into that :)
>
> > Speaking as a wg member.
>
> and one of the first ROV implementors, tyvm.
>
> > Shouldn’t you be checking the "my autonomous system number" in the
> > update message (when sending it out to the ebgp peer) as opposed to
> > "my autonomous system number" in the open message.
> >
> > Regards, Keyur
> >
> > On 3/17/20, 8:27 PM, "Randy Bush" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I wanted to avoid "be able to be" and have an explicit actor. I
> > > see
> > > the difficulty you point to below.
> >
> > i am happy to change to the following
> >
> > > > As the origin AS may be modified by outbound policy, a BGP
> > > > speaker
> > > > MUST apply ROV policy semantics using the My Autonomous System
> > > > number
> > > > in the BGP OPEN message (see RFC 4271 section 4.2) issued to
> > > > the peer
> > > > to which the UPDATE is being sent.
> >
> > but, in my free opinion, as it is in IETF LC, the change is enough
> > that
> > it might require approval by chairs and/or AD.
>
> i think you're right. what counts for ROV is the origin AS in the
> UPDATE. open a hole to deviate from that and ...
>
> and we have to remember that, for these UPDATEs which are
> redistributed
> into BGP by this speaker, have their AS_PATH first created when sent
> to
> the peer. i.e. we can not (yet) speak of the origin AS in the
> AS_PATH.
>
> so maybe
>
> As the origin AS of a BGP UPDATE is decided by configuration and
> outbound policy of the BGP speaker, a validating BGP speaker MUST
> apply Route Origin Validation policy semantics against the origin
> Autonomous System number which it will put in the AS_PATH (see
> RFC
> 4271 4.3 Path Attributes:b) of the UPDATE to the peer.
>
Although a little more verbose, perhaps the following is more explicit?
As the origin AS of a BGP UPDATE is decided by configuration and
outbound policy of the BGP speaker, a validating BGP speaker MUST
apply Route Origin Validation policy semantics against the Route
Origin ASN as determined by applying the procedure in [RFC6811,
Section 2] to the AS_PATH (see RFC 4271 4.3 Path Attributes:b) that
it will send in the UPDATE to the peer.
Cheers,
Ben
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
