> On May 29, 2020, at 9:44 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > These changes look sufficient to me. Hi Dale- Do you mean only the latest rewrite of Section 4.1, or does the above sign-off include the changes proposed in: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/z8wyJEalDv2mdMxkeSyaBa7Q7s0/ -- Chuck Lever _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- Re: [Gen-art] [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draf... David Noveck
- Re: [Gen-art] [nfsv4] Genart last call review of ... Trond Myklebust
- Re: [Gen-art] [nfsv4] Genart last call review... Chuck Lever
- Re: [Gen-art] [nfsv4] Genart last call review of ... Chuck Lever
- Re: [Gen-art] [nfsv4] Genart last call review... Dale R. Worley
- Re: [Gen-art] [nfsv4] Genart last call re... Chuck Lever
- Re: [Gen-art] [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draf... Dale R. Worley
- Re: [Gen-art] [nfsv4] Genart last call review of ... Chuck Lever
- Re: [Gen-art] [nfsv4] Genart last call review... Chuck Lever
- Re: [Gen-art] [nfsv4] Genart last call re... Dale R. Worley
- Re: [Gen-art] [nfsv4] Genart last ca... Chuck Lever
- Re: [Gen-art] [nfsv4] Genart las... Dale R. Worley
- Re: [Gen-art] [nfsv4] Genart las... Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Gen-art] [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draft-iet... Chuck Lever
- Re: [Gen-art] [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draf... Dale R. Worley
- Re: [Gen-art] [nfsv4] Genart last call review of draft-iet... Chuck Lever
