Reviewer: Francesca Palombini Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-15 Reviewer: Francesca Palombini Review Date: 2020-06-16 IETF LC End Date: None IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This draft is basically ready but has one minor issue, described in the review. Minor issues: In the last paragraph of Section 4 there are a number of non-normative may, should, must. I believe the last "should" at least could be normative: > Also, implementations should have validation to assure > that there is no recursion amongst nested routing policies. (More of a question than an issue) I was surprised that all but one references were considered normative. Is that common to consider the RFC that appear in the model as normative references for the document? Note that for the version reviewed, the Yang Validation for draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-15 failed: err : Data model "ietf-if-extensions" not found. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
