Thank you Vijay, The resolution of some of the last call comments was to change the intended status to Informational. I don’t see a need to re-issue the review if others do not.
Karen From: Vijay Gurbani <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 9:48 AM To: Harlan Stenn <[email protected]> Cc: "gen-art >> General area reviewing team" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Ntp] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09 Resent-From: <[email protected]> Resent-To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, Karen O'Donoghue <[email protected]> Resent-Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 9:48 AM Ah, I reviewed version 8, which had an intended status of Historic. As I was nearing the end of the document, -09 was released. Instead of reading -09 all over again, I read the diffs between -08 and -09. Looks like the intended status was changed to Informational in -09, and this change, while it showed up in the diff, escaped me since I looked at the changes in the body of the I-D, not the headers. I don't see a need to re-issue a Gen-ART review, unless others do, in which case I am happy to re-issue. Cheers, - vijay On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 8:52 PM Harlan Stenn <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I thought we were going for Informational. On 7/6/2020 10:18 AM, Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker wrote: > Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09 > Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani > Review Date: 2020-07-06 > IETF LC End Date: 2020-06-15 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: This I-D is ready to be published as a Historical RFC. > > Major issues: 0 > > Minor issues: 0 > > Nits/editorial comments: 0 > > > > _______________________________________________ > ntp mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp > -- Harlan Stenn <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> http://networktimefoundation.org - be a member!
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
