Meral, thanks for your review. Michael, thanks for the update. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa > On Sep 20, 2020, at 10:52 PM, Barry Leiba <[email protected]> wrote: > > That looks good to me, Michael. > > Barry > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 10:35 PM Michael Slusarz > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How about changing the first paragraph of Section 3.2 to the following: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "The server returns a variable-length string that is the generated preview > for that message. This string is intended to be viewed by the user as a > contextual preview of the entire message, and is not intended to be > interpreted in any way by the client software." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Slightly altered Barry's wording - "user" is already defined in Section 2 as > the human user, so to be consistent I think we should use "user" instead of > "end-user". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > michael > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> On 09/15/2020 3:26 PM Barry Leiba <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Meral, thanks for the review. The document does say in the first sentence >> of the Introduction that the preview is for the end user. I agree that it >> would be useful to emphasize that, though, and I think the right place to do >> it is by adding to the first paragraph of Section 3.2 something like the >> following: “The preview string is meant to help the end-user, and is not >> intended to be interpreted in any way by the client software.” >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Barry >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 4:52 PM Meral Shirazipour via Datatracker >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour >> >> >> >> >> >> Review result: Ready with Nits >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >> >> >> >> >> >> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed >> >> >> >> >> >> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just >> >> >> >> >> >> like any other last call comments. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> For more information, please see the FAQ at >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq >> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>>. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Document: draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-09 >> >> >> >> >> >> Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour >> >> >> >> >> >> Review Date: 2020-09-15 >> >> >> >> >> >> IETF LC End Date: 2020-09-14 >> >> >> >> >> >> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I >> have >> >> >> >> >> >> some comments. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Major issues: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Minor issues: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Nits/editorial comments: In Section 4.2, it would have been good to give some >> >> >> >> >> >> example and advice on when the client uses the preview to take some action. >> Is >> >> >> >> >> >> this to be avoided? (Was not very clear to me). >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Best Regards, >> >> >> >> >> >> Meral Shirazipour >> >> >> >> >> >> www.ericsson.com <http://www.ericsson.com/> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
