On 10/28/20 4:09 AM, Olaf Bergmann wrote:
Hi Paul, Ben and Göran,
Thanks for sorting this out. I have reverted #28 as Ben had suggested.
Paul, if you are happy with the other change [1] (a SHOULD for access
token uniqueness per client in alignment with the framework document), I
can submit version -14
Sure. Go for it.
Thanks,
Paul
[1]
https://github.com/ace-wg/ace-dtls-profile/commit/86008b3327f32e8ac2da0aa1b0110db64e3a467f
Grüße
Olaf
Paul Kyzivat <pkyzi...@alum.mit.edu> writes:
On 10/26/20 4:21 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
Hi Göran, Paul, Olaf,
Sorry for the slow reply.
I agree with Göran's original assessment that the language referring to
7049bis does provide enough information to have a deterministic encoding
for the HKDF inputs.
As such, I don't think pull #28 is needed, and would prefer that it was
reverted (the specific wording doesn't do a great job indicating
that the
whole list of requirements is "normative", to the extent that any
example
can be normative).
Ben, having raised the point, and knowing that you understood it, I am
satisfied with whatever changes you do or don't decide to make to
address it.
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
