Hi Alissa, and Linda, Thank you very much for your reviews!
Based on Alissa's message, we understand that no update is required regarding Linda's comments. Thanks, Carles (on behalf of the authors) > Linda, thanks for your review. I think on both points you raise what the > document proposes is well supported given the use case. I entered a No > Objection ballot. > > Alissa > >> On Sep 24, 2020, at 1:34 PM, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker >> <nore...@ietf.org> wrote: >> >> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar >> Review result: Almost Ready >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed >> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just >> like any other last call comments. >> >> For more information, please see the FAQ at >> >> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> >> Document: draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-10 >> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar >> Review Date: 2020-09-24 >> IETF LC End Date: 2020-09-30 >> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat >> >> Summary: >> This document describes the guidance on how to configure TCP parameters >> in the >> Constrained-Node-Networks. >> >> Major issues: >> 4.1.2. recommends ECN to be used in the Constrained Node networks. In >> any >> network, especially when many IoT devices are attached , the congestion >> can be >> very short lived. Having Constrained node supporting ECN can cause >> traffic >> oscillation. In addition, not many deployed internet supports ECN, it >> can be >> waste of processing of the CNN nodes. >> >> Section 4.1.1 recommend packet size to be 1280 for IPv6 to avoid the >> need to >> support Path MTU Discovery. it is problematic. There are many layers of >> tunneling and encapsulation in today's network, (let's not even assume >> SR), the >> actual packet size can be much larger. Supporting Path MTU Discovery is >> far >> less processing intensive than supporting ECN. >> >> Minor issues: >> >> Nits/editorial comments: >> >> Cheers, >> >> Linda Dunbar >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gen-art mailing list >> Gen-art@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art > > _______________________________________________ > Lwip mailing list > l...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
