Hi, I forgot a question I had, since this document and the semantics document together obsolete RFC7230 I am curious if there was a review that looked at both together with regards to RFC7230 Roni
> -----Original Message----- > From: Lars Eggert [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 2:45 PM > To: Roni Even > Cc: General Area Review Team; [email protected]; last- > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-16 > > Roni, thank you for your review. I have entered a Discuss ballot for this > document, since IANA has unresolved issues. > > Lars > > > > On 2021-6-9, at 12:23, Roni Even via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Reviewer: Roni Even > > Review result: Ready > > > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by > > the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like > > any other last call comments. > > > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > > > Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-?? > > Reviewer: Roni Even > > Review Date: 2021-06-09 > > IETF LC End Date: 2021-06-10 > > IESG Telechat date: 2021-06-17 > > > > Summary: > > The document is ready for publication as standard track RFC > > > > Major issues: > > > > Minor issues: > > > > Nits/editorial comments: > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gen-art mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
