Hi Sriram Responses in-line
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 12:25 PM Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) < [email protected]> wrote: > Gyan, > > > > >I think the document needs to clearly state that the role priority by > itself does not have an import policy that is automatically configured. > The import policy is based on OTC Attribute. The document should also > clearly state that Role priority must be used in conjunction with OTC > attribute. I think this is being implied but needs to be clear that role > priority must be used with OTC attribute for route leak detection and > prevention. Also in order for the route leak detection and prevention to > work correctly, the role priority cannot have an automatic inbound policy > and must depend on the dynamic signaling nature of OTC path attribute to > signal route leak. > > > > Just reporting back here the agreement in the off-list conversation > between you and the authors. We have made the following change (at the end > of Section 3.2) and you kindly accepted it: > > > > Old text: > > The BGP Role value for the local AS is used in the route leak > > prevention and detection procedures described in Section 4. > > New text: > > The BGP Role value for the local AS (in conjunction with the OTC > > Attribute in the received UPDATE message) is used in the route leak > > prevention and detection procedures described in Section 4. > > : Does this seem adequate? > > : Gyan> Yes. Perfect > > > > Thanks once again for your thorough review and help in improving the > readability of the document. > > Gyan> Welcome. The verbiage looks good. I am all set. > > Sriram / Alexander > > -- <http://www.verizon.com/> *Gyan Mishra* *Network Solutions A**rchitect * *Email [email protected] <[email protected]>* *M 301 502-1347*
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
