Vijay, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this 
document.

Lars


> On Sep 22, 2022, at 18:19, Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani
> Review result: Ready with Issues
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-kucherawy-bcp97bis-??
> Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
> Review Date: 2022-09-22
> IETF LC End Date: 2022-10-17
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary: This document is "Ready with Issues" to be published as a BCP.
> 
> Major issues:
> 
> Minor issues:
> - S1.1, first paragraph: "...subject matter in the RFC, ..."  Here, does the
> "RFC" refer to the document being considered for RFC status?  Or does it refer
> to the RFC in the normative reference?  I think it is the former, and if so,
> perhaps better to say "... subject matter in the RFC under consideration ..."
> (or "document under consideration". or even "RFC-to-be").  You hint to this
> dilemma later --- in S3, where you define "source" and "target" documents.
> Another option would be to move S3 before S1 and use the "source" and "target"
> terminology defined. - S1.1, top of page 4, first bullet ("If a protocol
> relies..."): Perhaps better to say "If a RFC-to-be defines a protocol that
> relies ..."? Or "If a target document defines a protocol that relies ...".
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> - S4.1: s/At the option of the author/editor/At the discretion of the
> author/editor/ - S4.2: s/added to the "Downref Registry"./added to the 
> "Downref
> Registry" (Section 7)./
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> - vijay
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to